‘Rango’ A Multifaceted Marvel

Art, Movies, Lit, Theater, Film, Film Review, On Screen Reviews

‘Rango’ A Multifaceted Marvel

No Comments 04 March 2011

Johnny Depp’s greatest talent as an actor is to inject a heavy dose of “weird” into any movie he is a part of. I happen to be a massive fan of Depp’s particular style of “weird” and think any movie would be made better for it. OK, maybe not “Schindler’s List,” but practically any movie.

Depp’s voice alone is enough to throw things delightfully off-kilter, as proven in the pitch-perfect, computer-animated film “Rango.”
I guess the best way to describe “Rango” is to imagine taking four-parts Spaghetti Western, one-part “The Lion King,” two-parts “Chinatown” and three-parts “Blazing Saddles”; dumping it all in a blender and pressing “puree.”

Depp plays the titular character Rango, a bug-eyed, squiggly-necked pet chameleon whose lonely existence is spent in his aquarium putting on dramatic, one-man productions for no one in particular.

Suddenly fate, in the form of a vehicular mishap, leaves Rango alone along the side of a blistering highway in the middle of the Mojave Desert.
He receives mystic guidance from an armadillo aptly named Roadkill (Alfred Molina), to head deep into the desert to a town called Dirt.

Once there he finds all manner of varmints and critters in a town that is quite literally drying up, as water is scarce and becoming increasingly harder to come by.

Completely out of his element, Rango decides to assume the role of a rough-and-tumble frontiersman and thanks to a lot of false bravado and a little luck he thoroughly convinces the townsfolk – to the point they make him their sheriff.

Tasked with finding out what happened to the water, Rango crosses paths with the requisite Western character-types. There is the mayor with murky motivations in the form of a leathery-old turtle (Ned Beatty), the no-nonsense love interest Beans (Isla Fisher) who is a newt trying to hold onto her family farm, the cynical kid looking for a hero (Abigail Breslin) and the dastardly, no-good villain, Rattlesnake Jake (Bill Nighy).
“Rango” was directed by Gore Verbinski who helmed all three “Pirates of the Caribbean” movies, which were basically big cartoons in their own right. Say what you like about the dude, but Verbinski certainly can put together an action sequence and “Rango” is chock full of them.

What is typically the case with animated films is the actors deliver their lines alone in a recording booth, but Verbinski rather unconventionally assembled the entire cast in one place and recorded them acting out their lines.
While this method doesn’t exactly revolutionize the medium, it does subtly improve the interaction between the characters and makes conversation between a chameleon and a horny toad seem as realistic as is possible.

When all is said and done, “Rango” is a delightfully strange little movie that effectively offers up a nice little “it’s OK to be yourself” message. Be aware that it might be a little on the dark side for very young children and it adopts a tone that is more amusing than laugh-out-loud funny.

Visually though, the movie is nothing short of spectacular and avoids the 3D craze proving that plain, ol’ two dimensions can still be eye-popping.

And really, who better than Depp to play a chameleon suffering from an identity crisis? It’s like his entire career has been summed up in one goofy little reptile. The only way they could ever hope to top it would be to get Mel Gibson to play an emotionally-unstable kangaroo. I guess we’ll just have to wait for the sequel.

“Rango” is rated PG for rude humor, language, action and smoking.

Stars Shine But Pass Misses

Film, Film Review

Stars Shine But Pass Misses

No Comments 25 February 2011

Men in relationships have a delusional part of our brains that for eons have been brilliantly exploited by waitresses for tips. Completely ignoring our personal history of lonely nights, this hunk of gray matter convinces us that were we to suddenly find ourselves single we would need a moat and several hundred teargas grenades to fend of the hordes of single women that would be beating down our door.
Two married men putting this far-flung and deeply ingrained fantasy to the test is the foundation of the hit-and-miss comedy “Hall Pass.”
The movie was directed by the Farrelly Brothers who began their career with three masterpieces of raunchy, low-brow comedy (“Dumb and Dumber,” “Kingpin,” and “There’s Something About Mary”).
Since then they have primarily wallowed in mediocrity, although I must admit with very faint praise, that “Hall Pass” is one of their better movies in a while.
The strength of the movie lies in its cast. Our average, married joes who are given a one-week break (or “hall pass”) from marriage are Rick, played by Owen Wilson and Fred, played by “Saturday Night Live’s” Jason Sudeikis.
Here Wilson does his thing as the straight-laced, slightly clueless Rick, and by now you either find him funny or you don’t. The real star of the movie winds up being Sudeikis, whose sweetly id-driven take on Fred winds up scoring most of the movies biggest laughs, including ending the movie on one of the greatest cut-to-credit jokes ever. Sudeikis is destined for bigger and better things.
Rick’s wife Maggie and Fred’s wife Grace are played respectively by the equally lovely and talented Jenna Fischer and Christina Applegate.

Story continues below video

YouTube Preview ImageWhy, you might ask, would these women be willing to set their husbands free out into the wild to cavort with any woman they please? The reasoning is pretty straightforward, with the idea being that once their hubbies realize they aren’t the hot commodities they thought they were, they will see the error in their ways and return even more devoted and dedicated to their marriages.
While the reasoning is sound, it’s the motivation behind the reasoning that is shaky at best. Typically with a Farrelly Brothers comedy, breaking down character motivation is nit-picky even for the most self-important of movie critics. But this is the driving force behind the entire premise of the movie, so take cover nits, because you are about to be picked.
First of all, Rick and Fred don’t seem all that miserable. They seem a little bored and restless, but that’s more about being middle-aged than craving infidelity.
And what about their wives, what do they perceive as the need to take such drastic steps? Well, their loyal and faithful husbands think about sex a lot and will, on occasion, clumsily check out other women.  How can such charming and intelligent women not realize this is the condition of 99.8 percent of heterosexual men in the universe?
This is why for the rest of the movie as we see two guys attempt to revel in something they neither asked for nor really need, the payoff for all of the zany misadventures and comeuppance that follows never really rings true.
This becomes even more problematic when the movie tries to make some grand point about relationships when it was never entirely clear what the heck was going on in the first place.
The movie is most comfortable when it is simply trying to make us laugh and the degree of success it achieves is dependent on the inclinations of your own sense of humor.
The Farrelly Brothers’ trademark outrageousness seems to have tempered over the years, with a few explosive exceptions. Most of the bits are woefully cliché (the guys get high on pot brownies, the guys strike out in a singles bar, etc.) and when a Richard Jenkins cameo as a pushing-60 ladies man never really pays off, you know your movie is having problems.
“Hall Pass” has a lot going for it, from a funny cast to an interesting premise, but it never really comes together which winds up making it more disappointing than anything else.

“Hall Pass” is rated R for crude and sexual humor throughout, language, some graphic nudity and drug use.

Oscar Bingo!

Features, Film, Games

Oscar Bingo!

No Comments 24 February 2011

Oscar Bingo 1

Oscar Bingo — just like the real thing, only without the tumbling ball machine or the letters B, I, N or G.

When you see one of the events listed happening, cover that space. Use this card, create your own or use the Academy’s official cards.

TFW Oscar Bingo Cards

Oscar Bingo 1

Official Academy Bingo Cards

83rd Academy Awards Bingo

Oscar Night Drinking Game

Dining & Drink, Features, Film

Oscar Night Drinking Game

No Comments 24 February 2011

No matter who wins, your liver loses!

If Oscar bingo isn’t your thing, how about a friendly Oscar night drinking game with compadres and acquaintances?
Here’s a starting point for rules for a semi-sodden Oscar celebration. Please remember to play responsibly. If a friend tries to drive impaired, feel free to go Christian Bale on their ass.

Take one sip:

• Presenter flubs up his or her line or mispronounces a name.
• Singing by Anne Hathaway or James Franco. Bonus: Singing by Gwyneth Paltrow.
• Joke falls flat.
• Ugly dress.
• Drink for every person you know on the annual Death Slideshow (shout “Don’t call me Shirley!” and slam back when you see Leslie Nielson).
• Dance number. Bonus: It’s ballet in honor of “Black Swan.”
• Orchestra cuts off overly long speech.
• Kissy-face.
• Someone calls for solidarity for Egypt, Libya, Bahrain, or any other country.
• Five or more people go up at the same time to accept award.
• Tears!
• Jeff Bridges has long hair.
• Mark Zuckerberg gets a mention.
• Someone tries to exit stage the wrong way and has to be wrangled by models.
• Helena Bohnam Carter or Russell Brand wear an outfit that could be described as “quirky.”
• When someone says, “This is so unexpected,” or the like.
• Movie trailer for one of the films up for an award airs during commercial break. Bonus: when a movie trailer for a film not up for an Academy Award airs.
• Winner puts on glasses to read acceptance speech.
• Sighting of former Academy Awards host (Jon Stewart, Billy Crystal, Alec Baldwin, Steve Martin, Hugh Jackman, Ellen DeGeneres, Chris Rock, Whoopi Goldberg, David Letterman, Chevy Chase, Goldie Hawn, Paul Hogan, Alan Alda, Jane Fonda, Robin Williams, Warren Beatty, etc.)

Take two sips:

• Wardrobe malfunction!
• Reminder that Haiti’s still in bad shape.
• Nick Cage sighting. Bonus: If he has awesome hair.
• Someone sports a ponytail.
• Visible tattoo. Bonus: Angelina Jolie.
• Disingenuous smile and applause from loser.
• James Cameron joke.
• Unfunny banter between James Franco and Anne Hathaway.
• Nominee shown in video or via video link.
• Weird giggles from winner.
• James Franco mentions cutting off his own arm.
• Someone mentions how long the awards ceremony is.
• Every time Anne Hathaway
changes costume.
• Joke about Jack Nicholson’s age.

Slam It!:

• Streaker!
• “Toy Story 3” DOESN’T win best animated feature.
• Nicole Kidman changes her facial expression. At all.

And The Winner Is …

Features, Film

And The Winner Is …

No Comments 24 February 2011

The 83rd Academy Awards will air at 7 p.m. Sunday, Feb. 27 on ABC stations.

Predicting the finish for Best Picture

By Mat DeKinder

TFW Contributing Writer

Sure it’s self-congratulatory, and giving awards to works of art is subjective at best and pointless at worst, but I don’t care. I love the Oscars!
Movie dorks like myself live for this time of year because it validates one of our favorite pastimes — arguing about movies.
The 83rd Annual Academy Awards are on Feb. 27, and there’s not a lot of intrigue in the acting categories this year. Colin Firth, Natalie Portman and Christian Bale are virtual shoo-ins in their respective categories.
The only doubt is in the Best Supporting Actress category where Melissa Leo looks to be the early favorite, but don’t be surprised if she gets knocked aside by her “The Fighter” co-star Amy Adams or the young and impressive Hailee Steinfeld from “True Grit.”
The fun is in the Best Picture race where another strong group has been fielded in the second year since the category expanded from five to 10 nominees.
The Academy lucked out because all 10 movies are actually worthy of consideration when in a lot of years they’ve been hard pressed to scrape together five decent flicks. They could have even opened the field up to 11 (with a minor snub for “The Town”) but I’m very cool with the movies that made the cut.
Here is a rundown of the movies up for the ultimate Hollywood prize listed in order of predicted finish:
10. “The Kids Are Alright” — You know it’s a strong year when this is your last-place movie. Annette Bening and Julianne Moore play a married lesbian couple in this indie, family drama. Strong acting overshadows a shaky plot, but just not strong enough to walk away with the award.
9. “Black Swan” — Who doesn’t love trippy flicks about ballet dancers? OK, so it’s probably a little too weird for the older Academy voters, plus Portman’s Best Actress win will be this movie’s moment in the sun.
8. “Winter’s Bone” — Now it starts to get tough, as from here on out any of these movies could have won the Oscar in lesser years. “Winter’s Bone” is unquestionably the least-seen of the nominated movies, but this study of meth dealers filmed in the Missouri Ozarks has the weight of a Greek epic. Good stuff.
7. “127 Hours” — Yes it’s a movie about a guy who has to cut his own arm off, but it’s also one of the most dynamic and life-affirming movies to feature one actor standing in place for most of the film. Plus, pinning James Franco under a boulder might be the only way to slow the dude down, this guy does everything, including co-hosting this year’s Oscars.
6. “Toy Story 3” — Probably the most beloved movie on the list with an ending that would make even a soulless robot cry (I’m looking at you Ryan Seacrest). That said, it’s animated and no animated movie will ever win Best Picture as long as there is a Best Animated Feature award. Sorry Buzz and Woody.
5. “The Fighter” — If the award were given out based solely on performances, this movie would win in a landslide. Even though it is the best-acted movie of the year, it’s still a boxing movie and there’s a lot in this film we’ve seen many, many times before. We’ll consider its loss a TKO.
4. “True Grit” — By remaking a John Wayne classic, the Coen Brothers have their biggest box-office hit and a long shot at their second Academy Award. Unfortunately remakes don’t have the best track record at the Oscars, so the Coens will just have to be happy with their millions and millions of dollars.
3. “Inception” — This was my favorite film of 2010, a movie that was big on both visual and intellectual spectacle. Its twisty-turny plot and audacious originality might understandably make it to difficult for voters to fully embrace. That said, not even so much as a nomination for the movie’s visionary director Christopher Nolan? Bad form, Oscar voters. Bad form.
2. “The Social Network” — This movie could very easily walk away with the big prize as it has cleaned up in most of the pre-Oscar awards. Director David Fincher and screenwriter Aaron Sorkin managed to make depositions and dorm rooms thrilling in what many have called the 21st century’s “Citizen Kane.” The problem is that it’s a movie about the Internet and there are a lot of older voters in the Academy who aren’t exactly “tech savvy.” Ernest Borgnine thinks the computer in his house is actively trying to kill him. It is for this reason my gut tells me the winner will be …
1. “The King’s Speech” — This is old-fashioned moviemaking at its finest. Take an inspirational true story, a stellar cast and a lead character with an affliction, inject some humor and romance, and you my friend have a big, ol’ juicy hunk of Oscar bait. Let’s face it, we’re still just colonies at heart and we love our movies about the British monarchy.

For more:

Oscar Night Drinking Game

Oscar Bingo!

Oscar Ballot – predict all the winners

Low And Highbrow Achieved

Film, Film Review

Low And Highbrow Achieved

No Comments 20 February 2011

‘Cedar Rapids’ a tale of innocence lost and poop

By Mat DeKinder

“Cedar Rapids” is one of those rare comedies that simultaneously aims for highbrow and lowbrow hilarity, and then manages to hit both marks.
It is a tale of innocence lost. It’s got poop jokes. And it happens to be the funniest movie of a young 2011.
Tim Lippe, as played by rising comedy star Ed Helms, is a rube of the highest order. He lives in the small town of Brown Valley, Wisconsin and works for Brown Star Insurance – a company name with the comedic subtlety of a seventh-grade boy.
Tim is devoid of vices, friendly, timid and dates his old sixth-grade teacher (Sigourney Weaver, still foxy after all these years). He’s practically begging for a real-world wakeup call.
The call comes unexpectedly when Tim is asked by his boss (Stephen Root, who instantly makes any movie better) to deliver a presentation at an insurance conference in the “big city” of Cedar Rapids, Iowa.
We chuckle as Tim is blown away by such exotics as air travel, rental cars and an African-American roommate, fellow insurance agent Ronald Wilkes (Isiah Whitlock Jr.) who turns out to be even blander than Tim.
Fate and hotel overbooking saddles Tim with a second roommate, the relentlessly obnoxious Dean Ziegler (as played by comedic-force-of-nature John C. Reilly). It’s almost strange to think that Reilly was once best-known as a dramatic actor because he might be the funniest guy working in Hollywood today.
Dean, or “Deanzie” as he likes to be called, is a fountain of scatological jokes and offensive comments, but he also boasts a strong sense of loyalty and a surprisingly fixed moral compass.
This complexity of the characters is what makes “Cedar Rapids” more than a run-of-the-mill comedy. These are real people, granted they are painted to the extreme, but they are much more than just empty shells there to allow the actors to mug for the camera.
This may be best illustrated in the character of Joan played by Anne Heche. We’ll ignore the fact that she might be the most attractive insurance agent in history and instead focus on how this convention veteran fits right in as one of the guys.
Yet when it becomes clear that this annual trip to Cedar Rapids is the highlight of her year and an escape from a weighty family life, a sense of quiet desperation creeps into her character. Heche has never been better and because we get to know these characters so well their misadventures become all the funnier.
Independent-film veteran director Miguel Arteta takes care to inject heart into his movie, but never at the expense of the jokes. Plus, at a lean 86 minutes, the movie never gives itself time to drag, which is a cue other comedy directors could certainly learn from (I’m looking at you Judd Apatow).
I’m fully aware that my praise for “Cedar Rapids” makes the movie sound a little dry, but please make no mistake, you will laugh at this movie. A lot. And that credit goes to the cast.
Reilly gets all the best lines and delivers them with vigor, and Heche displays the chops of a seasoned comedienne. Whitlock makes for a great straight-man and his character’s professed love for the HBO program “The Wire” is funny not only because it pays off later in the movie, but also because Whitlock himself had a recurring role on the show.
But this movie is all about Tim’s journey and Helms pulls it off effortlessly. As Tim’s illusions are shattered and he succumbs to various temptations, Helms somehow manages to keep Tim’s naiveté from becoming pathetic. He winds up being a guy you root for, not someone you pity. Helms is quietly becoming one of Hollywood’s most bankable comedic actors.
Who knew there was this much fun and excitement in Cedar Rapids? Maybe if we’re lucky there will be a sequel to show us the wild times to be had in Des Moines.
“Cedar Rapids” is rated R for crude and sexual content, language and drug use.

Mat DeKinder was once described as the “Jackie Moon of film critics” by a guy named Nate.

Liam Neeson: Badass

Film, Film Review

Liam Neeson: Badass

No Comments 18 February 2011

Late 50s actor becomes ‘Action Hero’

By Matt DeKinder

Liam Neeson has stumbled onto a title not usually acquired by men in their late 50s: Action Hero. With the surprise box-office hit “Taken,” Neeson became such a dogged, blood-splattering force for good that it became clear the 21st Century had found its Charles “Death Wish” Bronson or Clint “Dirty Harry” Eastwood.

Neeson takes up this badass mantle again in “Unknown,” yet another little solidly made, grownup thriller. While Neeson does play a decidedly different character this time around and “Unknown” features a much less direct plotline, the spiritual kinship to “Taken” is unmistakable.

Neeson plays Martin Harris, a doctor traveling to a conference in Berlin with his wife Elizabeth (January Jones). After forgetting his briefcase at the airport, Martin hops back in a taxi only to be knocked unconscious in a wreck that sends the vehicle crashing into a river.

He is pulled to safety by Gina the taxi driver (Diane Kruger of “Inglorious Basterds”) but spends the next four days in a coma. When Martin wakes up he discovers that he has no identification and that nobody, including his wife, seems to remember who he is.

In attempting to prove his identity, Martin enlists the help of Gina and former East German secret police officer Ernst Jurgen, played by venerable German actor Bruno Ganz.

Americans likely will recognize Ganz from his portrayal of Hitler in the exceptional film “Downfall,” a movie most people are familiar with thanks to various Internet clips where the subtitles have been replaced to make Ganz’s Hitler rant about everything from the Dallas Cowboys to the Republican Party.

Anyway, while attempting to reclaim his life, it becomes clear that Martin is at the center of some very sinister events, the machinations of which he must uncover or wind up dead.

Much of the first half of “Unknown” is a slow burn as Martin struggles with the frustration of losing his identity and questioning his own sanity.

You might even start to think you are watching a purely psychological thriller; that is until all the punching, car-chasing and exploding launches “Unknown” into a higher gear.

As an action flick, “Unknown” is tightly-drawn and satisfying, very much akin to what you might find in a “Bourne” movie. Spanish director Jaume Collet-Serra (who until now has been best known for directing lousy horror movies like “Orphan” and the remake of “House of Wax”) actually shows a lot of restraint by never letting the plot twists or action sequences come across as overly ridiculous.

While the rest of the cast is solid (including supporting turns by Aidan Quinn and Frank Langella) this is Neeson’s movie all the way.

His anguish and confusion take center stage until enough is enough. Then Neeson’s relentless determination takes over. I think having dinner with Neeson would be a stressful proposition, especially in a situation where you both were reaching for the last buffalo wing. Because if he wants that last wing, HE’S GOING TO GET THAT LAST WING!

Without Neeson, “Unknown” is an average movie at best, but with him an air of authenticity creeps into the film making it worthy of your time an attention. “Unknown” isn’t revolutionary or transcendent, but for action/thriller fans it’s a great way to spend two hours.

“Unknown” is rated PG-13 for some intense sequences of violence and action, and brief sexual content.

Mat DeKinder was once described as the “Jackie Moon of film critics” by a guy named Nate.

Go Without It

Film, Film Review

Go Without It

No Comments 11 February 2011

Jennifer Aniston and Adam Sandler in "Just Go With It"

Sandler looks bored in film

Adam Sandler has made a great career out of playing buffoons. When he burst onto the scene and achieved his greatest successes, Sandler was playing a manic buffoon in movies like “Billy Madison,” “Happy Gilmore,” and “The Waterboy.”
Now sure, none of these movies should be considered landmark works of western cinema, but they worked because Adam Sandler movies are funniest when the film’s energy comes from Sandler himself.
But then something happened and Sandler decided he wanted to play the cool buffoon. His characters became less outrageous as he took on broader everyman roles and instead of the crazy dude in the normal situation, he became the normal dude in the crazy situation. Considerably less hilarity ensued.
The success of an Adam Sandler movie now depends on the zaniness of the script and the energy of the movie is dependant on Sandler’s co-stars.
All of this has culminated in the low-water mark of the Sandler era with “Just Go With It,” a movie that is never offensively bad, just overwhelmingly bad.
This time around Sandler plays Danny, a commitment-phobic plastic surgeon who wears a wedding ring and concocts tales of tragic marriages to pick up women in bars. (You’d think the line “Hey, I’m a rich plastic surgeon” would work well enough, but who am I to judge.)
All this changes when Danny meets Palmer (Sports Illustrated swimsuit model Brooklyn Decker) without his trusty ring. Their hookup goes off without a hitch until the next morning when Palmer discovers the ring in Danny’s pocket.
Danny then comes up with a fake impending divorce that won’t be believed until he produces an ex-wife.
Enter Jennifer Aniston as Danny’s assistant Katherine. First of all I would like to get out of the way the fact that I have absolutely nothing against Aniston. I think she is a fine actress and she’s actually as good as she’s ever been in “Just Go With It.”
That said, she has been given waaaaaaay too many at-bats for an actress who has never produced a single box-office hit (“Marley & Me” doesn’t count, people went to see that one for the dog), and continues to be good in relentlessly bad movies. I am very puzzled as to why her career is as stable as it appears.
Anyway, Katherine agrees to pretend to be Danny’s ex-wife and then a series of ludicrously escalating lies result in Katherine’s two kids (played by Baliee Madison and Griffin Gluck) and Danny’s cousin Eddie (Nick Swardson, providing the goofy antics without which no Sandler movie would be complete) getting roped into the proceedings.
Of course the reasons Danny is so doggedly committed to winning over Palmer in a manner that winds up being insanely expensive and ultimately unsustainable are, um, well she’s atomically, smokin’ hot. That’s all I’ve got right now.
Everything results in the whole gang going to Hawaii, which kind of feels like the whole reason this movie was made. I’d be willing to bet the script was cobbled together in such a way as to cover an excuse for the cast and crew to film in a tropical location. Not that I blame them. Hey, if I could get my editors to buy that movie reviews written in Tahiti improved readership, don’t think for a second I wouldn’t do it.
I think what is most telling about “Just Go With It” is that for a vast majority of the movie, Sandler just looks bored. The guy used to throw himself at comedic roles so hard they had to scrape the gibberish and poop jokes off the walls afterward. Now as Sandler struggles to stay awake through an entire scene, how can the audience possibly be expected to retain consciousness? Oh right, the swimsuit model. Well at least that explains something.
“Just Go With It” is rated PG-13 for frequent crude and sexual content, partial nudity, brief drug references and language.

Mat DeKinder was once described as the “Jackie Moon of film critics” by a guy named Nate.

‘No Strings’ Rounds Up Half A Movie

Film, Film Review

‘No Strings’ Rounds Up Half A Movie

No Comments 21 January 2011

Natalie Portman and Ashton Kutcher play a couple of good friends in "No Strings Attached." And by good friends I mean intercourse acquaintances, coitus companions, f*** friends, sexual sidekicks, cohort copulaters and playmate procreators. Also, it’s a romantic comedy.

By Mat DeKinder

I think we as a society can all agree that Ashton Kutcher is way more famous than he has any right to be. Now I am not trying to argue that he is completely devoid of talent as an actor, but if fame was directly related to a body of work, you would be following the likes of John Turturro and Stanley Tucci on Twitter long before you thought to look up Kutcher.
But if we can separate the man from the tabloids for a moment, we can see that Kutcher has established a nice little career giving middle-of-the-road performances in bland (occasionally horrible) romantic comedies.
This is why it is no surprise at all to see Kutcher headlining the paint-by-numbers romantic comedy “No Strings Attached.” What is surprising is how enjoyable the first half of this film is, thanks entirely to the rest of the cast’s Herculean effort to conjure three-dimensional characters out of thin air.
Now sure, the back half of the movie completely collapses under the weight of the genre’s conventions, but hey, a quality hour of movie is roughly twice what I was expecting so I consider that a victory right there.
The plot of “No Strings Attached” is so tired it needs a spa vacation and about 36 hours of sleep, but the basic crux of the whole thing is that two friends attempt to have a sexual relationship without becoming romantically involved. Failure ensues.
The salvation of this entire enterprise is that one-half of this relationship is in the hands of Natalie Portman. While 2011 will be (likely) remembered in Portman’s career for snagging an Academy Award for her performance in “Black Swan,” some deference should be paid to the workman-like, turd-polishing effort she gives in “No Strings Attached.”
Portman plays Emma, an emotionally-closeted, type-A personality who spends most of the movie pushing back against Kutcher’s warm and big-hearted Adam.
In the hands of a Kristen Stewart or Katherine Heigl, it is likely that Emma would be so unlikeable and off-putting that it would be all you could do to keep from crawling up on screen and choking her.
Instead Portman manages to turn the character’s massive personality flaws into cute little foibles and somehow the result is a desirable human being. Such a high degree of acting is unquestionably more than this movie deserves.
The rest of “No Strings Attached” is peppered with odd situations and quirky characters that serve no real purpose other than being interesting for interesting’s sake. Again, the supporting cast works miracles with what little they are given.
Kevin Kline shows up as Adam’s mid-life-crisis-laden father, a former sit-com actor who winds up sleeping with one of Adam’s ex-girlfriends. Adam and Emma’s circle of friends include brief but solid turns from Greta Gerwig (“Greenberg”), Olivia Thirlby (“Juno”), Mindy Kaling (“The Office”) and the one, the only Ludacris.
“No Strings Attached” was directed by Ivan Reitman who hasn’t made a good movie in about 20 years. Of course he did direct “Ghostbusters,” and that little piece of perfection alone should allow him to make bad movies for the rest of his life if he so chooses.
Reitman doesn’t exactly mine a lot of laughs out of this script, but he does keep the movie from careening completely off the track and he did somehow convince Portman to sign on, so I guess he deserves some credit for that.
Look, “No Strings Attached” is not a particularly good movie. But at the same time it is not a particularly horrible one either and romantic comedy fans could certainly find a worse way to spend a Friday night.
Even Kutcher, freed from having to do any of the heavy lifting, is likeable and charming. In my perfect world would this movie catapult him to the level of fame he currently enjoys? No. But M. Emmet Walsh would hear him snapping at his heels.
“No Strings Attached” is rated R for sexual content, language and some drug material.

Mat DeKinder was once described as the “Jackie Moon of film critics” by a guy named Nate.

Spacey Delivers In ‘Casino Jack’

Film, Film Review

Spacey Delivers In ‘Casino Jack’

No Comments 18 January 2011

Kevin Spacey as Jack Abramhoff and Kelly Preston star in "Casino Jack."

So often when someone’s name becomes a headline their identity as a person tends to fade into the background.
Such was the case with Jack Abramoff, a man whose name became synonymous with “evil lobbyist” and went on to confirm basically everything we had ever assumed about the morally-ambiguous profession.
The movie “Casino Jack” attempts to find the man behind the “jerk who got what was coming to him” sentiments, and while the results are mixed, it does provide an interesting window into the heights of corruption of the Bush years.
Abramoff is played by Kevin Spacey, an actor who knows a thing or two about elusive characters. As a lobbyist Abramoff masterfully turned power and influence into cold hard cash thanks to a lot of fast talking and charm, two things that Spacey does best.
But Spacey also manages to capture the inevitability of the character, in that when you introduce someone as intelligent and ambitious as Abramoff to Washington’s halls of power he has no other path than the road to ruin. It is not surprising at all that Spacey has already snagged a Golden Globe nomination for Best Actor.
Along for the ride is Jack’s wife Pam (Kelly Preston) who is willfully oblivious to Jack’s wheelings and dealings, although to her credit, he does a nifty job of keeping her in the dark.
Jack’s partner Michael Scanlon is grandiosely played by Barry Pepper in a part so slimy it’s amazing he doesn’t leave a glistening trail behind him when he walks.
While Jack does manage to maintain a few delusions of moral integrity, Michael takes corruption and greed to obnoxious new heights. If you saw this guy at a bar you would patiently wait for someone to come up and punch him in the face.
I would be remiss if I didn’t mention Jon Lovitz as Jack’s lowlife buddy Adam Kidan whose shady business connections lead to alternately hilarious and violent confrontations. It shouldn’t come as that much of a surprise that this “Saturday Night Live” alum could perform admirably among master thespians. Acting! Genius!
If “Casino Jack” had remained as more of a character study it would have been a much more effective movie, but it gets bogged down in its attempts break down all of the plots, schemes and machinations that led to Abramoff’s downfall.
Director George Hickenlooper has worked primarily as a documentary filmmaker which helps to explain the movie’s focus on the Who? What? When? and Where? while shortchanging the Why?
There is not much cinematic about this movie with the notable exception of a scene where Jack imagines himself delivering a verbal tirade during a senate subcommittee hearing.
Ultimately “Casino Jack” has the feel of a made-for-TV movie meant to incite rage at the atmosphere created by the Bush administration that allowed the Jack Abramoffs of the world to flourish.
It is because of the smallness of the scope of the film that Spacey’s killer performance seems a bit wasted. Still, the movie does manage to shed a little light on this classic tale of ambition spiraling out of control for those of us who were just too lazy to read beyond the headlines.
“Casino Jack” is rated R for pervasive language, some violence and brief nudity.

Mat DeKinder was once described as the “Jackie Moon of film critics” by a guy named Nate.

© 2012 The Free Weekly. All rights reserved. Powered by Wordpress.