Has ONF’s Cooperative Spirit Come to an End?

Posted by |

To the Editor:

While I have no interest in engaging in a debate per se, I do think the community deserves a fuller image of recent events at Ozark Natural Foods.

*Low prices for members* is at the top of ONF’s Mission Statement and this economic concept determines the cooperative structure and its reason for being.

At this point, the financial statements and management strategy all shout *profit maximization* rather than reasonable prices. While this banner may have a great deal of currency in the public mind, it ultimately undermines the unique advantage ONF has over its competitors — the membership. Obviously some profit is a sign of fiscal health and is needed for store expansion as well as to service debt. ONF’s net income percentage is almost double that of their peers in the grocery industry. But the excessive profit strategy has no place in a true cooperative and we now see the result.

ONF has lost its way. By accumulating millions of dollars of members’ funds first and then deciding, for example, to be debt-free, current board and management have created an upside-down situation — some board members saying they “work for the general manager” rather than representing the membership — and the attendant political strife. Board members were specifically told in July 2011 not to discuss the mortgage payoff proposal and the accompanying $300k prepayment penalty with the membership. Similarly, the idea of bringing in a debt management expert to lay out the long- and short-term financial consequences of this idea was recently deemed not worthy of discussion by the board.

Ralston and Graham’s chief problem was to question the debt-free strategy. Of course it is politically inefficient to develop priorities in advance and open up to a wider membership the decision to expend $1.5 million or more in working capital. It is much easier to have a compliant Board, thereby cutting off member participation in significant decisions. ONF will survive this crisis, but the cooperative economic spirit remains a distant memory.

Stephen Vallus


Calvin Bey July 4, 2012 at 3:29 pm

Good letter Stephen Vallus. I suspect you have pinpointed the crux of the ONF issues. In my view we have a Board problem. Without ONF membership involvement, how can GM take such action… especially with $300k prepayment penalty plan shrouded in “secrecy”. The Board allowed this. Why? This alone was reason for prompt and permanent action by the Board.

I agree the Coop should and can survive, but only if “full disclosure, transparency of business and membership involvement” is standard operating procedure. Membership expects and deserves no less.

Calvin Bey, Fayetteville

Reply to this comment
Judith levine July 4, 2012 at 5:26 pm

As ONF owners since the Watson St. days, we have seen some dysfunction over the years, but nothing beats what is going on now. Cannot wait for a drama free healthy grocery store to open.

Reply to this comment
Sharon Davison July 4, 2012 at 9:27 pm

Members seem to be taking another hit. I had been told about 6 years ago that the board represented the members first, gm second & employees third under our co-op model. The board saying they are there to jump for the gm was just not right.
Too bad it will take so much rebuilding.
Good Luck to those of you who expend the effort!
Sharon Davison

Reply to this comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. All fields are required.